Price
specifications: [[item.skuinfo]]
price: [[item.currency]][[item.price]]
Mark Z. Danielewski's 'House of Leaves,' published in 2000, is a Postmodern, Poststructural novel that challenged conventional boundaries upon its release. The concept of the 'rhizome,' a theoretical model for the ultimate Poststructural book form, was proposed by philosophers Deleuze and Guattari in their 1976 paper 'Introduction to the Rhizome.' In a highly regarded academic paper from 2002, Hazel Stuart argues that Danielewski's work can be considered a novel of truly rhizomatic form.
The question at hand is whether 'House of Leaves' proves the Rhizome Theory, and if so, how. Deleuze and Guattari's Rhizome Theory envisions a non-hierarchical, non-centered, and non-linear structure that allows for multiple entry and exit points, much like the intricate root system of a rhizome plant. This conceptual framework stands in contrast to the traditional, arborescent (tree-like) structure often associated with Western thought and literature.
Stuart's analysis delves into the multifaceted and labyrinthine nature of 'House of Leaves,' which she argues embodies the principles of the Rhizome Theory. The novel's complex narrative, with its nested layers of narration, footnotes, and appendices, creates a rhizomatic reading experience that challenges the reader to navigate the text in unconventional ways. The lack of a central, authoritative voice and the constant shifts in perspective and interpretation mirror the Rhizome Theory's rejection of a single, fixed meaning.
Furthermore, the novel's exploration of the mysterious and ever-changing house at its core, which defies logical explanation and physical constraints, can be seen as a metaphorical representation of the rhizome's ability to grow and expand in unpredictable directions. The house's labyrinthine corridors and shifting dimensions reflect the Rhizome Theory's emphasis on multiplicity, interconnectedness, and the rejection of binary oppositions.
Stuart's paper delves into the various narrative techniques and structural elements employed by Danielewski that align with the Rhizome Theory. She highlights the novel's incorporation of diverse media, such as photographs, diagrams, and typographical experiments, which further contribute to the rhizomatic reading experience. The constant disruption of linear time and the blurring of boundaries between reality and fiction also align with the Rhizome Theory's embrace of non-linearity and the rejection of fixed identities.
In conclusion, Hazel Stuart's analysis convincingly argues that 'House of Leaves' can be regarded as a literary work that embodies the principles of the Rhizome Theory. The novel's complex, multilayered structure, its rejection of a single, authoritative narrative, and its embrace of unconventional storytelling techniques all point to Danielewski's successful integration of Deleuze and Guattari's theoretical model. Through its innovative and rhizomatic form, 'House of Leaves' challenges the reader to engage with the text in a dynamic and nonlinear manner, ultimately proving the applicability of the Rhizome Theory to contemporary Postmodern literature.
product information:
Attribute | Value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
publication_date | December 30, 2020 | ||||
language | English | ||||
file_size | 1853 KB | ||||
text_to_speech | Enabled | ||||
screen_reader | Supported | ||||
enhanced_typesetting | Enabled | ||||
x_ray | Not Enabled | ||||
word_wise | Enabled | ||||
sticky_notes | On Kindle Scribe | ||||
print_length | 80 pages | ||||
best_sellers_rank | #201,706 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store) #17 in Semiotics & Theory Literary Criticism #475 in Literary Criticism & Theory #632 in Literary Movements & Periods | ||||
customer_reviews |
|